Post-Quantum Cryptography Explained
Understand the quantum threat, NIST standards, and how to migrate your cryptographic infrastructure to quantum-safe algorithms.
Why Quantum Threatens Current Cryptography
Today's encryption relies on mathematical problems that classical computers cannot solve in a reasonable time. Quantum computers, using quantum mechanical properties, can solve these problems exponentially faster.
The Quantum Threat
A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could break RSA, ECC, and other current encryption methods using Shor's algorithm. This affects TLS, digital signatures, key exchange, and virtually all modern cryptographic systems.
At Risk
- RSA (all key sizes)
- Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC)
- Diffie-Hellman key exchange
- DSA digital signatures
Quantum-Safe
- ML-DSA (FIPS 204)
- ML-KEM (FIPS 203)
- SLH-DSA (FIPS 205)
- AES-256 (with increased key sizes)
“Harvest Now, Decrypt Later”
Even without quantum computers today, adversaries may be collecting encrypted data now to decrypt later when quantum computers become available. This makes migration urgent for sensitive, long-lived data.
NIST Post-Quantum Cryptography Standards
The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has finalized the first post-quantum cryptography standards after an eight-year global competition.
FIPS 203
ML-KEMModule-Lattice-Based Key-Encapsulation Mechanism. Based on the CRYSTALS-Kyber algorithm. Used for key establishment and key exchange.
FIPS 204
ML-DSAModule-Lattice-Based Digital Signature Algorithm. Based on CRYSTALS-Dilithium. Used for digital signatures.
FIPS 205
SLH-DSAStateless Hash-Based Digital Signature Algorithm. Based on SPHINCS+. Alternative signature scheme using hash functions.
ML-DSA vs ML-KEM Explained
Understanding when to use each algorithm is crucial for implementing quantum-safe cryptography correctly.
ML-DSA (Signatures)
Digital signatures prove authenticity and integrity. Use ML-DSA when you need to:
- Sign documents and contracts
- Authenticate software and updates
- Create audit trails
- Issue certificates
- Sign API requests
ML-KEM (Key Exchange)
Key encapsulation securely shares encryption keys. Use ML-KEM when you need to:
- Establish TLS connections
- Exchange symmetric keys
- Encrypt data at rest
- Set up secure channels
- Wrap/unwrap keys
| Property | ML-DSA | ML-KEM |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Digital signatures | Key encapsulation |
| Based on | Module lattices | Module lattices |
| NIST Standard | FIPS 204 | FIPS 203 |
| Original Algorithm | CRYSTALS-Dilithium | CRYSTALS-Kyber |
| Security Levels | 2, 3, 5 | 1, 3, 5 |
| Key Size (L3) | ~2.5 KB | ~1.5 KB |
Security Levels Guide
NIST defines five security levels based on the difficulty of breaking the encryption. Higher levels provide more security but with larger key sizes and slower operations.
General purpose applications
Standard business applications
Sensitive data, financial services
Government, defense, long-term secrets
Migration Strategies
Migrating to post-quantum cryptography requires careful planning. GRIDERA supports multiple migration strategies based on your risk tolerance and timeline.
1. Hybrid Approach (Recommended)
Combine classical and post-quantum algorithms for maximum security. If either algorithm is broken, the other still provides protection.
2. Pure PQC Migration
Replace classical algorithms entirely with post-quantum alternatives. Simpler but requires confidence in PQC algorithm security.
3. Crypto Agility
Design systems to easily switch algorithms without major code changes. Essential for long-term flexibility as standards evolve.
GRIDERA Migration Wizard
Our migration wizard guides you through:
- Cryptographic inventory discovery
- Risk assessment and prioritization
- Algorithm selection guidance
- Key rotation automation
- Compatibility testing
- Progress monitoring
Ready to migrate to quantum-safe cryptography?
Start with a security assessment to understand your current cryptographic posture.
Start Security Assessment